Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neile Wolfe's avatar

This conclusion strikes me as spot on.

In the years ahead, the software industry will be defined not by who can create the most disruptive technology, but by who can adapt fastest and best leverage AI to enhance and elevate existing business models. For incumbents like Netflix, Shopify, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Atlassian, SAP, Nintendo, Adobe, and Veeva, AI offers a golden opportunity to boost internal productivity, maintain their market positions, and continue innovating without the existential threat posed by new entrants.

Daniel's avatar

my 2 cents:

1/

i think the original post did not argue that stocks would fare worse - but rather, that society will.

originally those who enjoy the intelligence premium, but that will trickle down to every part of society.

that was what so captivating about it.

I was hoping your post would touch on that sensitive topic, maybe sprinkle some positive light on it (e.g. many/ most of agents would increase the GDP thus "raising all boats", the rise of agent would offset exactly the aging population leaving the workforce).

2/

you raised pretty compelling arguments on why those who adapt, will probably not just survive but thrive.

i tend to agree.

i think the saaspocolipse is mostly behind us. there's still a lot of damage on the surface but the storm moved on.

i'm not sure if we've seen the bottom though. there's so much that can happen that can derail this fast moving train...

anything from EU passing some AI safety/ sovereignty/ job protection regulations, some actor "poisoning the well" by performing greatest disaster/ fraud known to man, to companies choosing pricing models that hurt the bottom line.

none will stop progress, but a new bottom on the way up is always a possibility :)

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?